Top self-storage management companies in California, ranked by ChatGPT answers

If by “self-storage management companies” you mean third-party operators that manage facilities on behalf of owners/investors, California has several strong options. Rather than ranking them, here’s a useful comparison based on current industry presence and the services they publicly describe.

The 2026 Inside Self-Storage facility-management list places Extra Space, CubeSmart, Storage Asset Management, Public Storage, West Coast Self-Storage and StoragePRO among the leading management platforms nationally.

The big three

Extra Space Storage ManagementPlus is particularly notable if you want a large institutional platform. Extra Space says its third-party program manages 4,000+ properties and provides day-to-day management, revenue management, marketing and call-center capabilities.

CubeSmart Management says it manages 875+ stores and 58+ million rentable square feet, with services covering marketing, revenue optimization, sales-center support, operations, accounting, HR and facility services.

Public Storage Advantage offers third-party management through its established Public Storage platform, including marketing, pricing/revenue management, financial reporting, staffing and operational support.

California-focused alternatives

StoragePRO Management is worth looking at if you prefer a company with a strong California footprint rather than a giant national REIT. The California Self Storage Association describes it as providing third-party management to independent owners, with an emphasis on people, procedures and technology.

Self Storage Management of California (SSMC) is another particularly relevant option for California owners. Its stated footprint is 38 facilities and roughly 15,000 units across California, with management services including marketing, payroll, vendor coordination, inspections, audits, reporting and operational performance measurement.

What I'd compare before selecting one

For an owner, I wouldn't choose solely on company size. Ask each firm for the same proposal and compare:

• Management fee: percentage of gross revenue vs. fixed fee
• Lease-up strategy: especially important for a newly built or recently acquired facility
• Revenue management: frequency and methodology of rent changes
• Marketing: Google/SEO, paid search, listing sites, call center and local marketing
• Staffing: who employs the manager and who pays payroll
• Maintenance: markup on vendors and repair-management fees
• Technology: PMS, access control, cameras, kiosks and online rentals
• Reporting: daily/monthly reporting and owner dashboards
• Insurance revenue: whether/how insurance income is shared
• Contract terms: initial term, termination rights and management-change provisions
• California-specific experience: local labor, regulatory and market knowledge

One particularly important point: CubeSmart publicly says its management fee is based on gross revenue and that facility-level expenses are passed through to the owner, while its FAQ says a monthly minimum can make management uneconomical for facilities below 35,000 rentable square feet unless they're in a high-rent market.

If you're an owner looking to hire a manager, tell me the California city/market, number of units, rentable SF, occupancy, and whether it's stabilized or in lease-up. I can then compare 5–8 management companies specifically for that type of facility, including typical fee structures, California coverage, services, and what to ask for in the RFP.

Places ChatGPT showed

• StoragePro Management, Inc. · 1.0★ · Property management company
• Self Storage Mgt of California · Property management company
• Southwest Self Storage - Corporate Office · Corporate office
• Legacy Storage Management · 3.7★ · Property management company
• Crescendo Self Storage Management · Property management company
• Storage3 (Formerly Arco’s Self Storage Manteca) · 4.8★ · Self-storage facility

If by “best” you mean strong fit for an independent owner—not necessarily the largest operator, I’d put these California-focused or California-strong third-party managers on a shortlist. I’m not treating “best” as an objective ranking; the right choice depends heavily on your facility size, geography, staffing model, and whether you want to keep your existing brand.

Two others worth putting in the RFP

Hello Storage is particularly interesting for independent owners because it says its exclusive focus is third-party management, with an emphasis on boutique-level service while operating at scale. It's headquartered in Southern California and manages properties across California and several other states.

CubeSmart Third-Party Management is the opposite end of the spectrum: a very large institutional platform. It currently reports 875+ managed stores, 240+ owner partnerships and 58M+ rentable square feet. It's worth getting a proposal if your facility is large enough to benefit from institutional revenue-management, marketing and operating systems.

My practical shortlist

For an independent California owner, I'd solicit proposals from roughly 4–5 companies rather than choosing based on reputation alone:

1. StoragePRO — established California specialist/full-service platform.
2. Purely Storage — family-owned/owner-oriented alternative.
3. SSMC — particularly compelling for Central/Northern California.
4. Southwest Self Storage — worth including for Southern California assets.
5. Hello Storage or Crescendo — depending on your geography and desired management style.

The important thing is to compare the economics and incentives, not just the management fee. Ask every candidate for:

• Management fee and minimum monthly fee
• Contract term and termination provisions
• Whether they take a percentage of gross revenue, collected revenue, or NOI
• Who keeps tenant-insurance, admin, late, lock-cut, merchandise and other ancillary income
• Whether there are markups on maintenance/vendor invoices
• Revenue-management/rent-increase methodology
• Staffing model and who pays for on-site employees
• Call-center vs. local customer service
• Marketing budget and who controls the Google/business profile
• Technology requirements and who pays for software/access-control changes
• Monthly owner reporting and financial statements
• CapEx approval thresholds
• How they handle California lien-law compliance
• References from owners of facilities similar to yours

California's Self Storage Association specifically distinguishes owners using independent third-party management, so there is a substantial established third-party-management market in the state.

If you tell me (1) city/region, (2) number of units, (3) approximate rentable SF, (4) current occupancy, and (5) whether it's staffed or unmanned, I can narrow this to the 3–5 managers that are most relevant to your specific facility and compare their fee structures, geographic coverage, and management models.

Places ChatGPT showed

• StoragePro Management, Inc. · 1.0★ · Property management company
• Legacy Storage Management · 3.7★ · Property management company
• SKS Management · 2.5★ · Property management company

If by “best at revenue management and pricing” you mean the sophistication of their dynamic pricing, market-rate analysis, rent increases, promotion optimization, and data science—not simply who has the highest rents, the strongest California-relevant candidates are the large national platforms plus a few California specialists.

I’d put them into the following non-ranked shortlist, based on publicly documented capabilities rather than a subjective winner:

• Extra Space Storage — ManagementPlus. Its revenue-management system uses proprietary algorithms to price units through different occupancy stages, with pricing at both portfolio and granular levels. Its data-science/RM team specifically works on dynamic pricing and market-sensitive rate optimization.
• CubeSmart — Third-Party Management. CubeSmart is unusually explicit about its revenue-management infrastructure: forecasting and pricing-optimization engines, automated promotion triggers, human pricing analysts, competitive mapping, and unit-level pricing decisions. It currently reports 875+ managed stores.
• Public Storage. Public Storage describes its approach as data-driven and AI-based revenue optimization, with a long-running focus on balancing occupancy and rent per square foot. Its scale provides an enormous pricing dataset.
• StoragePRO Management, Inc.. A California-based third-party manager that specifically emphasizes street-rate analysis, dynamic pricing and scheduled rent increases, alongside marketing and centralized management.
• Legacy Storage Management. California-focused and specifically markets revenue management/dynamic pricing and technology-driven operations.
• SKS Management. Another California specialist that explicitly includes pricing, tenant rent increases, financial reporting and revenue management in its management offering.

What stands out

For a large California portfolio or a sophisticated lease-up, I'd pay particular attention to Extra Space and CubeSmart. Their public descriptions show dedicated revenue-management/data-science organizations rather than pricing being merely one function of a local property manager. Extra Space, for example, says its RM group dynamically prices at both portfolio and granular levels and uses testing to respond to market/customer behavior.

CubeSmart is particularly interesting if you want to scrutinize the mechanics of pricing. It describes a system combining a revenue forecast, pricing optimization engine, automated promotions, analyst review, and competitive-pricing intelligence.

There is also some current industry evidence consistent with the importance of these systems: a Q2 2026 industry analysis found that REIT-managed stores were achieving higher street rates than the broader non-REIT operator universe, although that does not establish that the management companies themselves caused the difference.

If you're selecting a manager for your own California facilities

I wouldn't judge them simply by asking “Do you have dynamic pricing?” Almost everybody will say yes. I'd ask each manager for these specific metrics and examples:

1. Move-in rate optimization: How frequently are advertised street rates recalculated?
2. Occupancy/rate tradeoff: What triggers a price increase versus a promotional discount?
3. Unit-level pricing: Can they price a 5×10 differently from another 5×10 based on floor, access, age, location, or demand?
4. Competitive data: How many competing facilities are monitored around each property, and how frequently?
5. ECRI strategy: How are existing-tenant increases determined, and how do they estimate move-out risk?
6. Lease-up strategy: Do they deliberately sacrifice initial rate to accelerate occupancy, and when do they transition toward rate maximization?
7. Revenue KPIs: Do they optimize rental revenue per available SF, not merely occupancy?
8. Experimentation: Do they A/B test prices, promotions, web presentation and lead-conversion tactics?
9. Owner reporting: Can they show you monthly street rate, achieved rate, occupancy, move-in rate, ECRI impact, concessions and revenue per occupied SF?
10. California-specific experience: Can they show actual results from comparable California properties rather than national averages?

One especially important distinction: a manager can have excellent revenue-management technology but mediocre execution at an individual property. I'd therefore ask for a 12–24 month before/after case study from a California facility with similar unit mix, competition, occupancy and age.

If you tell me how many California facilities you have, approximate total units/NRSF, and whether they're stabilized or in lease-up, I can build a more rigorous Extra Space vs. CubeSmart vs. StoragePRO vs. Legacy/SKS comparison, focusing specifically on pricing sophistication, ECRI strategy, lease-up pricing, fees, reporting, and owner alignment.

Places ChatGPT showed

• StoragePro Management, Inc. · 1.0★ · Property management company
• Crescendo Self Storage Management · Property management company
• Platinum Storage Group · 4.3★ · Real estate developer
• Legacy Storage Management · 3.7★ · Property management company
• Cubix Asset Management · Property Management

If you mean third-party managers for a newly developed self-storage project in California, I’d focus on firms with demonstrated lease-up, revenue management, digital marketing, and pre-opening/development support, rather than simply the largest storage operators.

The 2026 industry rankings put Extra Space Storage, CubeSmart, Public Storage, West Coast Self-Storage, StoragePRO, Platinum Storage Group, Purely Storage, and several other operators among the larger management platforms.

The companies I’d put on an RFP list

• StoragePRO Management, Inc. — Particularly relevant for California. It is a California-based third-party storage manager and offers the operational infrastructure you'd want for a lease-up, including marketing, revenue/pricing management, call-center support, accounting, and staffing. Its California footprint is a meaningful advantage if your project is in Northern California.
• Crescendo Self Storage Management — A California specialist whose stated focus includes leasing up new facilities as well as improving existing properties. I'd include them if you want a more storage-specialist, regional operator rather than a national REIT platform.
• Platinum Storage Group — Worth serious consideration for a Southern California development because it combines development, ownership, acquisitions and third-party management. That vertically integrated experience can be useful when the manager needs to understand a new project's economics rather than just operate a stabilized property.
• Legacy Storage Management — Anaheim-based storage specialist with management experience spanning operations, revenue management, staffing, vendor coordination and reporting. Its leadership also has storage development experience, which is relevant to a new-build lease-up.
• Purely Storage, Inc. — Newport Beach-based operator/manager with a multi-state platform. I'd consider them particularly if you want a more hands-on operating model rather than a purely centralized management approach.
• Cubix Asset Management — A Northern California-focused self-storage asset/management platform. It is worth an RFP for projects where local market knowledge and a more integrated asset-management approach matter.

The national platforms I'd also bid

CubeSmart deserves particular attention. Its third-party platform had 872 stores / 57.5 million rentable square feet as of June 30, 2026, and its management offering explicitly addresses lease-up, revenue optimization, marketing, 24/7 sales-center support and pre-opening development input. CubeSmart says it wants to be involved early enough to advise on site layout, unit mix, office layout and signage, and it prepares projections covering revenue, NOI and lease-up.

Public Storage Advantage is another obvious RFP candidate. Public Storage emphasizes its national marketing/revenue-management platform, call centers, pricing systems and transition infrastructure for third-party owners.

Extra Space Storage should also be on the list. Industry data places it at the top of the 2026 facility-management ranking, and its enormous third-party management platform gives it substantial data, marketing and revenue-management scale.

How I'd structure the shortlist

For a new California development, rather than declaring one universally "best," I'd compare them on these specific dimensions:

One particularly useful data point: CubeSmart says its management agreement can include a pre-opening projection of expenses, revenue, NOI and lease-up, while it also provides daily reporting on rentals, vacates, occupancy, revenue and A/R. That's exactly the sort of information I'd require from every bidder.

My practical RFP group

If I were putting together a California new-development RFP, I'd probably solicit proposals from:

1. StoragePRO
2. Crescendo
3. Platinum Storage Group
4. Legacy Storage Management
5. CubeSmart
6. Extra Space Storage
7. Public Storage
8. Purely Storage

That gives you a useful mix of California specialists + national platforms, rather than comparing eight companies that all have essentially the same operating model.

If you give me the California market/city, approximate rentable SF, number of units, climate-controlled vs. drive-up mix, and whether it's urban/infill or suburban, I can narrow this to a much more useful 3–5 company shortlist and compare their likely fit for your specific lease-up.

Log in for more personalized help with work, projects, and career goals.

If you mean third-party operators that manage self-storage facilities for owners/investors, there are several established choices in Southern California. I’d evaluate them on portfolio scale, Southern California operating experience, reporting/revenue-management capabilities, and how closely their incentives align with the owner.

Established Southern California options

• Extra Space Storage — A very large third-party management platform. Its ManagementPlus program says it manages 4,000+ properties and provides marketing, revenue management, operations, and technology. The 2026 Inside Self-Storage list places Extra Space first among facility-management companies by managed rentable square footage.
• Public Storage — Particularly relevant if you want the resources and brand recognition of the industry's largest operator. Its Public Storage Advantage program provides revenue management, marketing, HR, financial reporting, and operational support.
• StoragePRO Management — A long-established third-party management company with a California focus. It specifically markets its services to independent owners and provides operations, technology, staffing, and performance-management support. It ranks #9 on the 2026 ISS facility-management list.
• TNT Self Storage Management — A Southern California-focused operator with roots going back to 1977. It provides turnkey staffing, marketing, accounting, revenue management, and daily operations; it currently says its operations team oversees 21 California facilities.
• Southwest Self Storage — A San Diego-based operator with 30+ years of experience and involvement in more than 30 properties across California, Arizona, and Colorado. Its model emphasizes hands-on regional management, accounting, employees, marketing, and reporting.
• Hello Storage — Headquartered in San Juan Capistrano and focused exclusively on third-party management. It manages properties across California and neighboring states and says some clients have been with the company for 15+ years. It appears on the 2026 ISS Top 50 list.
• Extra Space Storage — A very large third-party management platform. Its ManagementPlus program says it manages 4,000+ properties and provides marketing, revenue management, operations, and technology. The 2026 Inside Self-Storage list places Extra Space first among facility-management companies by managed rentable square footage.
• Public Storage — Particularly relevant if you want the resources and brand recognition of the industry's largest operator. Its Public Storage Advantage program provides revenue management, marketing, HR, financial reporting, and operational support.
• StoragePRO Management — A long-established third-party management company with a California focus. It specifically markets its services to independent owners and provides operations, technology, staffing, and performance-management support. It ranks #9 on the 2026 ISS facility-management list.
• TNT Self Storage Management — A Southern California-focused operator with roots going back to 1977. It provides turnkey staffing, marketing, accounting, revenue management, and daily operations; it currently says its operations team oversees 21 California facilities.
• Southwest Self Storage — A San Diego-based operator with 30+ years of experience and involvement in more than 30 properties across California, Arizona, and Colorado. Its model emphasizes hands-on regional management, accounting, employees, marketing, and reporting.
• Hello Storage — Headquartered in San Juan Capistrano and focused exclusively on third-party management. It manages properties across California and neighboring states and says some clients have been with the company for 15+ years. It appears on the 2026 ISS Top 50 list.

For a Southern California facility, I'd interview at least Extra Space, StoragePRO, TNT, Southwest, and Hello Storage. That's not a ranking of which is "best"; they represent somewhat different management models and scales.

The key questions I'd ask each company are:

1. How many Southern California properties do you currently manage?
2. Who will actually be my regional manager, and how many properties do they oversee?
3. What is your management fee structure? Base fee vs. incentive fee matters considerably.
4. What revenue-management system do you use, and who controls pricing?
5. What are your typical occupancy and economic-occupancy results for comparable facilities?
6. What expenses are passed through to the owner?
7. How frequently will I receive financial statements and operating KPIs?
8. Who controls marketing spend and vendor contracts?
9. What is the contract term and termination provision?
10. Can you provide 3–5 owner references for comparable Southern California properties?

One particularly important distinction is scale versus local attention. A national platform can bring sophisticated revenue management, marketing, technology, purchasing power, and a large operating infrastructure. A regional manager may offer more direct ownership access and a more hands-on approach. The appropriate choice depends heavily on your facility's size, location, competitive set, and whether you're optimizing an existing asset or taking over a distressed/underperforming one.

If you tell me the city, approximate unit count/RSF, current occupancy, and whether you're an owner looking for third-party management, I can narrow this to the 3–5 companies I'd solicit proposals from and compare their likely fit.

Places ChatGPT showed

• StoragePro Management, Inc. · 1.0★ · Property management company
• Bay's Elite Management Group · 4.5★ · Property Management
• Schmitt & Co · 1.0★ · Self Storage
• StorQuest Self Storage · 3.1★ · Self-storage facility
• Diede Property Management · Property management company

If you mean third-party management companies for self-storage owners/operators, rather than companies that simply own storage facilities, Northern California has several credible choices. Based on current footprint, specialization, and the scope of services they publicly document, I’d put these on the shortlist:

My practical shortlist

StoragePRO is worth talking to if you're looking for a scaled, institutional-style third-party manager. Its current materials report more than 9M SF, 64,000+ units and 150+ locations across its managed portfolio, with third-party management specifically aimed at improving operating income and reducing expenses.

SKS Management is particularly interesting for an owner who wants a hands-on regional operator rather than a giant national platform. SKS says it has 100+ employees and 2.3M+ rentable SF in Northern California, spanning places including Sacramento, Oakland, San Francisco, San Jose, Fremont, Redwood City and San Mateo. It also says district/regional managers are limited to no more than seven properties.

Schmitt & Co. looks especially relevant if you own one to five facilities and want a more boutique relationship. The company explicitly says it specializes in independent self-storage owners and has historically concentrated on Northern California. Its services include site operations, strategic planning, revenue/rate management and digital marketing.

SSMC is particularly worth investigating if the properties are along the I-5/Highway 99 corridor or in the Central Valley. Its California Self Storage Association profile reports 38 managed sites, about 1.9M SF and approximately 15,000 units, with offices in places including Sacramento, Merced, Atwater, San Jose and Redding.

One important distinction

I wouldn't automatically choose the company with the largest portfolio. For a self-storage owner, I'd compare:

• Management fee and minimum monthly fee
• Whether the fee is based on gross revenue, effective gross income, or NOI
• Revenue-management/rent-optimization capability
• Who pays for onsite staffing, call-center services and software
• Vendor markups and maintenance oversight
• Marketing and SEO responsibility
• Delinquency/lien-sale administration
• Reporting and owner transparency
• Whether they will manage your existing brand or want to rebrand it
• Contract termination provisions
• Whether they have an acquisition incentive that could create a conflict with your interests

For example, SKS explicitly says it preserves the owner's existing business name and brand, while providing its management infrastructure.

If you tell me the approximate location(s), number of units, and whether these are stabilized facilities or lease-up/new construction, I can narrow this to the 3–5 companies I'd interview and compare their likely fee structures, geographic coverage, and management model.

Places ChatGPT showed

• StoragePro Management, Inc. · 1.0★ · Property management company
• Schmitt & Co Management · 1.0★ · Property management company
• Crescendo Self Storage Management · Property management company
• Southwest Self Storage - Corporate Office · Corporate office

If by “reasonable” you mean low, transparent third-party management fees for an owner of a California self-storage facility, the clearest publicly disclosed options I found are:

The two strongest fee candidates

1\. StoragePRO — 5% publicly states that its management fee is 5% of facility revenue. It also describes revenue management, marketing, call-center support, accounting/reporting and other operational services.

That is notably below the commonly cited 5–8% third-party self-storage management range and below the roughly 6% industry benchmark reported by Inside Self-Storage.

2\. Schmitt & Co. — 6% is based in Novato and has historically concentrated on Northern California. Its published fee is 6% of gross revenues, although it says a setup fee may apply depending on the property's software systems.

It has a particularly useful feature for an owner comparing proposals: its management contract is month-to-month with 30 days' notice to terminate.

A potentially important alternative: Journey Managed

Journey Managed advertises 6% flat with bookkeeping included and no line-item add-ons. Its published package includes operations/staffing, revenue management, marketing, collections, auctions, bookkeeping, P&L reporting, technology and owner reporting.

So although its headline percentage is 1 point higher than StoragePRO, 6% all-in can actually be cheaper than a 5% manager that adds accounting, technology, setup, insurance-program or other fees.

What I'd negotiate

For a California facility, I would not compare proposals solely on the headline percentage. Industry sources specifically caution that a nominal 5–6% fee can become materially higher after pass-through and ancillary charges.

I'd ask each manager to quote the following on exactly the same basis:

• Management fee as % of collected gross revenue
• Minimum monthly fee
• Setup/onboarding fee
• Accounting/bookkeeping fee
• Technology/software fee
• Call-center fee
• Marketing fee
• Maintenance markup
• Construction/project-management fee
• Tenant-insurance/protection-program revenue split
• Credit-card processing markup
• Lease-up fee or separate fee during stabilization
• Annual contract escalation
• Termination fee
• Whether management receives any vendor rebates or commissions

For context, self-storage management fees are commonly around 5–8% of effective gross income, while older industry data put single-property management around 6–7% and larger portfolios potentially around 4%.

Bottom line: Based strictly on publicly disclosed pricing, I'd put StoragePRO's 5% and Schmitt & Co.'s 6% at the top of the list for fee transparency in California. But if you're evaluating an actual facility, the better comparison is the effective all-in management cost, not the advertised percentage.

If you give me your facility location, number of units, rentable square feet, and approximate annual gross revenue, I can build a side-by-side fee model for 5–8 California managers and calculate what each would cost you annually.

Places ChatGPT showed

• StoragePro Management, Inc. · 1.0★ · Property management company
• Crescendo Self Storage Management · Property management company
• Sequoia Self Storage · 4.9★ · Self-storage facility

If by “trusted” you mean third-party managers with evidence of long-term owner relationships, California roots, and owner testimonials, I’d put the following companies on a diligence list. I would not treat this as a definitive ranking—the evidence is mostly company-reported testimonials and industry information, not an independent satisfaction survey.

California-focused / locally rooted managers

• StoragePRO Management, Inc. — Walnut Creek / Northern California. This is probably the clearest match to what you're describing. StoragePRO says it is locally owned and concentrated in California, and its owner testimonials include clients who have stayed with the company for 8+ years. One owner specifically describes the relationship as transparent and responsive and says the company helped increase his portfolio's bottom line.
• SKS Management — Oakland / California, Hawaii & Nevada. SKS has been managing self-storage for more than 30 years and says it has long-term owner relationships exceeding 25 years. It is larger than a typical family operator, but still has a regional rather than national focus.
• Crescendo Self Storage Management — Roseville / Northern California. A California-based third-party operator focused specifically on self-storage, with services covering operations, staffing, marketing, financial controls and revenue management. Its public business profile includes owner-oriented testimonials about transitions to its management. This is one I'd investigate if the facility is in Northern California.
• Southwest Self Storage — Southern California-oriented. The company describes itself as family-owned and says its management team has been involved in owning, developing and managing 30+ storage facilities across California, Colorado and Arizona. It also provides acquisition, financing, capital-improvement and disposition assistance, which can be useful if the owner wants more than day-to-day management.

One important distinction

There are also family-owned storage operators that aren't necessarily third-party management companies. For example, Sequoia Self Storage in Redwood City is family-owned, while companies such as Don Temple Storage in Long Beach have remained family-operated for decades. Those are evidence of local operating experience, but they're different from hiring a third-party manager for your facility.

How I'd vet the shortlist

For an owner considering handing over a facility, I'd ask each manager for 3–5 current owner references, preferably:

• A single/family-owned facility similar in size to yours
• An owner who switched from another management company
• An owner who has been with them 5+ years
• A facility in the same California submarket
• Actual before/after KPIs: occupancy, effective rent, bad debt, payroll, NOI and management fees

I'd also specifically ask about management-fee structure, ancillary fees, revenue-management practices, employee turnover, who controls pricing, accounting transparency, and termination provisions. Those tend to tell you considerably more than generic “owner testimonials.”

If you tell me what part of California the facility is in (e.g. Bay Area, Sacramento, Central Valley, LA/OC, San Diego), approximate unit count, and whether it's stabilized or lease-up, I can narrow this to 5–8 locally owned managers that actually operate in that market and compare their ownership references, portfolio size, services and apparent reputation.